This natural audio news package is about Feed My Starving Children, a non profit organization that focuses on packing meals for starving children all around the globe. The primary focus of this story is what FMSC is, what goes into a meal that they pack, and why it’s so important for people to come and volunteer.
Positives: 1. This was a well told story. The first interview subject laid out the ground work as to what the story/organization was about. The student then opened up the scope of the story by using certain soundbytes that showed why efforts like these were needed on a global scale making the story more accessible for people who may not live in the town where this pantry is located. 2. This story also had good video composition. There were few to no shaky shots, plenty of close-up shots to show us exactly what these volunteers were doing, and the student also make it a point to write to what the interview subjects were saying. That means when they were talking about things like shipping or packaging the food items, we actually saw the interview subjects shipping or packaging the food items. The viewer did not have to imagine those things happening. Good job!
Improvements: 1. The piece could used a little more compelling natural sound. For example, at the very beginning of the story, we heard natural sound, but it wasn't of one thing in particular. Rather, it was just ambient, cluttered sound from the room. Next time, try to focus your microphone on one thing happening in the room, like the sound of pasta falling into a bowl or one of the volunteers yelling out something to another volunteer. Those moments are more interesting. 2. Don't be afraid to explore different ways to shoot your interviews too. Technically speaking, all of your interviews were set up correctly. However, I really wanted to see something like you interviewing a person as they were packaging the food materials. Those type of interview compositions can give your stories an extra element that enhances it.
Positives: Nice job getting broll of all the parts of your story. Interviews shot well
Improvements: Be careful with nats. You can overuse it. From :35-:56, you kept pausing for things that don’t have or need a nat pop. A pallet doesn’t make noise unless it’s being moved or pausing on the shipping wall. This just made me lose interest Not every idea, event or story is a good topic for a nat pkg. This would have benefited from a reporter track. You jumped from what are we to we don’t have enough volunteers to the world’s hunger problem. Also the packing room sounded loud but the nats were all the same or not there. I would cut this down to 1:30 and get rid of most of the nat pops. This would have been a more complete story if you had interviewed a volunteer.
Positives: Good variety of shots at FMSC. This story has the potential for plenty of natural audio.
Improvements: Work on the storyline by attempting to bridge natural audio and SOTs more effectively. What you believe to be natural audio is just background noise. Natural audio pops would include the mic picking up a box being dropped, a clearer pour of the rice into the bag, the scoop digging at the rice, laughter or motivational moments from those participating in. A way to increase your chances at these moments stems from thinking outside the box with shots, placing your microphone on a surface that could encourage other sound, or having your interviewees wear their mics and filing their interactions for awhile with FMSC.
Positives:
Improvements:
Positives:
Improvements: