A promotional video for the fall play "12 Angry Jurors".
Positives: -The style and simplicity makes this compelling. -The story is not made clear. This is good. That mystery matches the image. -The lighting was not only appropriate, but well-executed. The lightning effect was not overdone, as it often is. -The VO might have sat a hair higher in the mix, but largely, the mix was solid. -The tone set by the delayed image was not betrayed by overworking the scene. -Very nice, steady dolly. I didn't notice it, and I'm watching for it. Very fine.
Improvements: -The main subject is shifty in his stance. This takes away from the impact of his action at the end. -I'd have preferred if a student had delivered the VO.
Positives: the lighting was really well executed. It looked like they were working on a professional set with the backlighting and smoke affect
Improvements: I had some trouble connecting the content of the audio with the video and there were some minor shakes in the camera work
Positives: Nice use of Black and White, tied in well with the original
Improvements: Could have had the attorney mouth the words to make it more effective
Positives:
Improvements: